Tel: +44 1202 233 214
  • Home
  • What We Do
    • Welfare Reform | Helping Landlords to Cope
    • Training >
      • Understanding and Delivering Value for Money Workshops
      • Delivering Excellent Customer Service Training
      • Getting to Grips with Complaints Training
      • Delivering Effective Scrutiny Through Performance Validation Training
    • Regulatory Standards | Healthchecks & Advice
    • Policy & Strategy
    • Value for Money in Social Housing
    • Analysis, Insight & Research
    • Benchmarking
    • Business Planning
    • Cultural Change
    • Interim Management
    • IT Services and Strategies
    • Lean Systems Reviews & Process Re-engineering
    • Performance Management
    • Project Management
    • Resident Involvement & Scrutiny
    • Service Improvement
    • Stock Rationalisation
  • Why Choose Us?
  • V3a
    • V3a Brochure
    • V3a Testimonials
  • Testimonials
  • News & Views

Five Things Not To Include in a Social Housing Value for Money Statement

17/3/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
As the current financial year draws to a close, and the bedroom tax becomes a reality, thoughts will soon be turning to the Vfm Statements required within the housing sector’s Operating and Financial Reviews.

Here we set out five top tip tips on what not to include in them.

If you'd like top tips & help on what to include in them, contact us, or simply use V3a. It will do the hard work for you.


1: A Simple ‘Yield’ Calculation to demonstrate your ‘return on assets’

For Example,
  • Our turnover was a, our surplus was b, so our return was a/b*100 = xx%.
  • The net book value of our assets is a. Our surplus was b. So our annual return on assets is b/a *100 = xx%

The second of these is the better, but is meaningless without reference to net leverage and how that compares with others. If you’re not leveraging your assets to their full potential, you’re not maximising the potential return on assets, and can’t demonstrate how you’re optimising the future returns on assets

2: The usual ‘where each pound’ of your rent goes

It may have been vogue but it won’t transparently demonstrate your overall operating costs and how they compare. You need to demonstrate your total operating costs (overall and for key areas) and how they compare. The HCA will be looking for clarity on the 37% variation in operating costs across the sector which their regression analysis was unable to explain.

3: A statement of your organisational objectives without detail of how you’ve delivered Vfm against them

A simple statement that the return on assets is used to further your organisational objectives won’t cut the mustard. The HCA & Investors will want to see examples of how ‘rigorous appraisal of all potential options for improving value for money have been applied’ to objectives . Particularly any non core housing activities - for which they will want to see an ‘understanding of the trade offs and opportunity costs of decisions’ taken to invest in them rather than bricks and mortar.

4: Any form of ineffective comparison with others

The HCA’s regulatory standards feedback document couldn’t make this clearer. ‘We expect that providers themselves will measure and evaluate their strategies and deliverables, in the overall context of achieving their organisational aims and objectives, and that this will be most effective where it involves comparison with other (and others’) approaches.

Make the ‘others’ meaningful and relevant. If you’re an LSVT which is older than 5 years, you’re a traditional HA. Get used to it. Compare regionally on costs but nationally on performance or outcomes. Cost is regionally influenced. Performance and satisfaction shouldn’t be.

5: No backward or forward look

If you can’t show where you’ve come from you won’t be able to show where you’re going. The bottom line remains the main focus of economic regulation. Year on year improvements expected in value for money will be judged by year on year improvements and changes in areas such as your operating margin, SBIT, EBITDA, adjusted net leverage and debt per home. Three years either way will be the minimum expected.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Latest Newsletter >
    Tweets by @UltimateVFM

    Archives

    September 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    September 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011

    Categories

    All
    News
    Views

    RSS Feed

    Latest Industry News & Views

    Join our mailing list to receive information and updated News & Views from us

    Subscribe to our mailing list

    * indicates required
    Email Format

Our Products & Services

What We do
V3a

Our Company

Who We Are

Contact us

Our Contact Details
Copyright PHHS 2007- 2014. All Rights Reserved.